Note: This summary reflects our best understanding as of July 2025 and will very likely evolve as Treasury issues implementing regulations. Always consult a tax professional or legal advisor before acting on these provisions.
A practical guide for nonprofits, donors & schools
Signed July 4 2025
1 — 30-Second Take-Away
Winners | Losers |
---|---|
Small-dollar donors – permanent $1 000 / $2 000 above-the-line deduction (starts 2026) | High-income donors – 0.5 % AGI floor and Pease cap cut top benefit from 37 ¢ → ≈ 35 ¢ |
K-12 SGOs – $1 700 credit redirects gifts their way (2027) | Corporations whose giving is < 1 % of taxable income – first dollars no longer deductible |
Treasury – larger excise haul from elite endowments & $1 M+ pay packages | Elite universities – endowment tax tiers leap to 4 % / 8 % |
2 — Individual Giving Rules (apply to 2026 returns and after)
Provision | Old Law | New Law | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Above-the-line deduction (non-itemizers) | Expired 2021 | Up to $1 000 / $2 000 cash gifts; no DAFs | Promote in every mass appeal |
0.5 % AGI floor (itemizers) | None | Only gifts above the floor deductible | Encourage bunching / DAF front-loads |
Pease-style cap (§ 68) | Suspended since 2018 | Flat 5.4 % haircut → top benefit ≈ 35 ¢ per $1 | Show after-tax cost in proposals |
60 % AGI cash limit | Sunsetting 2025 | Permanent | Keeps “mega-gift” ceiling high |
Editor’s View: The New Pease Squeeze
- Velvet-glove pickpocket … donors still feel generous; Treasury quietly skims 5 %.
- Two-cent sting … a seven-figure pledge now loses ~ $20 000 of tax value.
- Floor and cap … one rule pushes gifts up; the other shaves them down.
- Optics over outcomes … lawmakers “help charity” while redirecting big-gift dollars.
- Complexity kills … every extra spreadsheet tab risks a cooled pledge.
- Fundraiser mantra … lead with mission, follow with tax – or watch the biggest checks vanish.
3 — Corporate Giving
New Rule | Detail | Fund-Raising Angle |
---|---|---|
1 % taxable-income floor | Gifts below 1 % aren’t deductible; 10 % cap & 5-year carry-forward remain | Target firms already over 1 %; front-load multi-year sponsorships |
4 — $1 700 K-12 Scholarship Credit (2027)
- Non-refundable 100 % credit, max $1 700 per taxpayer, for gifts to state-certified SGOs
- Student eligibility: ≤ 300 % of area-median income
- States may opt in or out
Tip: If your mission touches education equity, partner early with SGOs before donor dollars migrate.
5 — University Endowment Excise Tax
Assets per student | Rate |
---|---|
$500 K – $750 K | 1.4 % |
$750 K – $2 M | 4 % |
> $2 M | 8 % |
- Tax base widened – includes student-loan interest & federally funded IP royalties
- Annual IRS/Treasury report starts 2026
- Action: Stress-test endowment draw; consider donor-designated quasi-funds
6 — Non-Profit Executive Pay
The 21 % excise now hits every current / former employee earning > $1 M – not just the top five. Boards should model costs for physicians, athletics coaches, and golden-parachute packages.
7 — Timeline Cheat-Sheet
Takes effect | Provision |
---|---|
Tax years after 12-31-2025 | Corporate 1 % floor • Expanded § 4960 pay tax • University tiers/reporting |
2026 return | Non-itemizer deduction • 0.5 % AGI floor • Pease cap |
2027 return | $1 700 scholarship credit |
8 — What Got Cut
- Higher private-foundation excise tiers
- UBIT on parking & name/logo royalties
- Mandatory DAF payout
- § 501(p) fast-track revocation power
All removed in conference.
9 — Immediate To-Dos
- Refresh appeals – trumpet the $1 000 / $2 000 write-off.
- Bundle big gifts – DAF front-loads or multi-year pledges to leap the 0.5 % floor.
- Re-price sponsorships – structure giving so firms clear the 1 % floor.
- Audit comp – flag anyone likely to cross $1 M (including deferred payouts).
- Model endowment tax – brief trustees on 4 % / 8 % scenarios.
How This Information Was Assimilated
- Benchmarked Industry Commentary
We began by reviewing how top financial firms and policy experts interpreted the bill, identifying trends, blind spots, and inconsistencies. - Analyzed the Bill Directly Using AI
We procured the full legislative text and ran it through three separate AI systems—each tasked with analyzing the document twice for clarity, contradictions, and key takeaways. - Compared AI Output Against Human Commentary
We cross-checked the AI-generated insights against the financial industry’s interpretations and refined the content where necessary to enhance clarity, accuracy, and practical use. - Human Oversight and Synthesis
Finally, experienced human reviewers interpreted, contextualized, and refined the output for nonprofit relevance and actionability.
Note: While we’ve aimed for precision, minor discrepancies may exist. Purely human interpretations often introduce greater variance—and occasionally, unintentional opinion masquerading as fact.